March 6th, 2013 § Comments Off § permalink
April 26th, 2012 § Comments Off § permalink
By: John Stauber, founder of the Center for Media and Democracy, co-author of Mad Cow USA
Published on Thursday, April 26, 2012 by Common Dreams
Americans might remember that when the first mad cow was confirmed in the United States in December, 2003, it was major news. The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) had been petitioned for years by lawyers from farm and consumer groups I worked with to stop the cannibal feeding practices that transmit this horrible, always fatal, human and animal dementia. When the first cow was found in Washington state, the government said it would stop such feeding, and the media went away. But once the cameras were off and the reporters were gone nothing substantial changed.
In the United States, dairy calves are still taken from their mothers and fed the blood and fat of dead cattle. This is no doubt a way to infect them with the mad cow disease that has now been incubating here for decades, spread through such animal feeding practices. No one knows how the latest dairy cow was infected, the fourth confirmed in the United States. Maybe it was nursed on cow’s blood. Perhaps it was fed feed containing cattle fat with traces of cattle protein. Or perhaps there is a mad cow disease in pigs in the United States, which simply has not been found yet, because pigs are not tested for it at all, even though pigs are fed both pig and cattle byproducts, and then the blood, fat and other waste parts of these pigs are fed to cattle.
All these U.S. cattle feeding methods are long banned and illegal in other countries that suffered through but eventually dealt properly with mad cow disease. Here, rather than stopping the transmission of the disease by stopping the cannibal feeding, mad cow is simply covered up with inadequate testing and very adequate public relations. US cattle are still fed mammalian blood, fat and protein, risking human deaths and threatening the long term safety of human blood products, simply to provide the U.S. livestock industry with a cheap protein source and a cheap way to get rid of dead animal waste.
I began researching this issue around 1989, long before the disease was confirmed to have jumped from cattle to the people eating them, as announced by the British government in 1996. In 1997 I co-authored <http://www.prwatch.org/books/madcow.html> Mad Cow USA, warning that the disease was likely already here and spreading, since the animal cannibalism that caused its outbreak in Britain and spread it to other countries was actually more widespread in the United States than anywhere.
Some years ago responsible U.S. beef companies wanted to test their animals for mad cow disease and label their beef as being disease free, but they were forbidden under penalty of law from doing so. Only the USDA can test for mad cows in America. In 2004 and 2005, after two additional mad cows were discovered in Texas and Alabama, the United Sates government declared that obviously mad cow wasn’t much of a problem and gutted it’s anemic testing program. Today only about 40,000 cattle a year are tested, out of tens of millions slaughtered. It’s amazing that the California cow was even detected given this pathetic testing program that seems well designed to hide rather than find mad cows.
The prevention of mad cow disease is relatively simple. If your country has it, test each animal at slaughter to keep the diseased animals out of the food chain. Cheap, accurate and easy tests are now available in other countries but illegal here. Testing cattle both identifies the true extent of the disease, and keeps infected animals from being eaten in your sausage or hamburger. In this manner countries like Britain, Germany, France and Japan have controlled their problem through testing and a strict ban on cannibal feed.
Once mad cow disease moves into the human population of a country, all bets are off as to what could happen next. It’s a very slow disease, it develops invisibly over decades in someone who has been infected, and it is always fatal. We’ll know a lot more in fifty years, but the future looks worrisome. In Britain people are dying from mad cow disease, people who never consumed infected meat. They used medical products containing human blood, and that blood was infected because it was from infected people. There is no test to identify infectious prions, the causal agent, in blood.
Almost none of this information appeared in news stories about the California mad cow. Instead the headlines and the talking heads fed us the line that the United States fixed this problem long ago, and the fact that only 4 mad cows have been detected so far is proof of our success. Oprah Winfrey once tried via her talk show to warn about this, way back in 1996, but Texas cattlemen dragged her and her guest Howard Lyman into court and she had to spend many millions of dollars defending herself from the supposed crime of slandering meat.
Oprah won her case, which was probably unfortunate for the rest of us because had she been convicted the ensuing appeals court trial might have gotten enough attention to wake up Americans to the truth. Instead Oprah learned her lesson – shut up and you won’t get sued. Other media learned too that if the government and industry can silence Oprah, they can muzzle anyone. (One of the 4 confirmed U.S. mad cows was later found in Texas, appropriately enough.)
There are a handful of dedicated activists such as Howard Lyman who have been sounding the alarm on this. They include the ecologist Dr. Michael Hansen of Consumers Union and Dr. Michael Greger, a physician. Terry Singletary Jr., whose mom died of a version of the human form of mad cow disease, has been a relentless, unpaid activist on this issue.
Despite their dedicated work, there is no indication that anything is going to change here in America. The U.S. government refuses to implement the feed ban and the animal testing necessary. It doesn’t matter if the President is named Clinton, Bush or Obama because their bureaucrats in the USDA and FDA stay the course and keep the cover up going. Docile, eating what they are fed, trusting the rancher all the way to the slaughterhouse. Is that just the cows, or is it us too?
July 30th, 2011 § Comments Off § permalink
Hundreds of local residents packed Adams meeting room to tell DNR of Richfield CAFO’s impact on environment and quality of life
John Peck, Family Farm Defenders, email@example.com. 608-260-0900
Bob Clarke, firstname.lastname@example.org. 608-296-1443
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
July 26, 2011
MADISON, Wis. – Less than a week after hundreds of local residents packed an Adams, Wis., meeting room to voice their objection to a factory farm’s efforts to bring 5,000 dairy cows to a small parcel of land, neighbors intensified their efforts to prevent the establishment of the Richfield CAFO (Concentrated Animal Feeding Operation) by moving the fight into the legal realm.
Residents joined with Family Farm Defenders (FFD) to file a request for a contested case hearing with the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, and a petition for review in Dane County Circuit Court. On June 24, 2011, the Water Division of the WDNR had given statutory approval to the plans and specifications for the Richfield CAFO, owned by MilkSource Inc.
“We are not pleased with the statutory approval,” said Arlene and Hiroshi Kanno, board member of FFD and one of the parties who are bringing the complaint.
The legal filing questions the factual accuracy surrounding the factory farm’s bid to locate in central Wisconsin, taking issue with the impact that 5,000 cows and their manure will have on water and air quality for residents of nearby towns in an area that has been known as a tourist magnet recognized for clean waters and quality fishing.
But an equally important factor is the impact that factory farms are having on individual farmers.
“We are told that the DNR must expedite and limit conditions in these permits because it is good for the dairy industry. It may be good for the owners and investors in these CAFOs and good for dairy processors, but it is not good for other dairy farmers in the state,” said Sarah Lloyd, who farms with her husband and his family outside the Wisconsin Dells. “I don’t need 5,000 cows’ milk dumped on my market and I don’t need the increased land rent prices we are seeing as land competition grows because of these large farms.”
Many CAFOs around the country have been cited or fined for violating their water discharge permits. This includes MilkSource, in the case of their Rosendale and Tidy View CAFOs, with manure-spreading violations. (A CAFO generates the same amount of waste as a small city but, unlike a city, is not required to process or treat its sewage.)
“MilkSource was cited in Rosendale for spreading too close to a private well and again at Tidy View by spreading on a field not included in the Nutrient Management Plan or approved by the DNR,” said Coloma landowner Bob Clarke , one of the parties challenging the DNR and Richfield. In both cases, the violations became known to the DNR through citizen complaints.
In a letter to the DNR, neighbors of the Rosendale CAFO describes what has happened to their community since the factory farm moved in.
“We who live near the dairy or in areas surrounding spreading fields are experiencing health problems and wrongful loss of outdoor celebrations. Neighbors are suffering from migraines, asthma, pounding headaches, and chronic stress. When spreading occurs near neighboring gardens, some have taken to wearing a respiratory face mask for weeks in order to work in their own gardens. Hydrogen sulfide and ammonia are toxic emissions that now invade our breathing space. There has been absolutely no action from Rosendale Dairy in response to citizen complaints. We have simply been told it’s not going to get any better.”
The danger to the water supply is even greater.
“To us, the risk of polluted groundwater is too high, especially in the sandy soils in this area,” the Kannos said. “We also are extremely concerned with the unsustainable levels of pumping from the aquifer, and the possible drying of neighbors’ wells.”
MilkSource has estimated that it would use 52.5 million gallons of water per year, yet it proposes wells with the capacity to draw 525 million gallons from local aquifers. A decade ago, local residents defeated a bid by Perrier and Nestle to situate a water bottling facility in the area.
The Central Sands area includes the Necedah National Wildlife Refuge whose inhabitants include two endangered species, the whooping crane and the Karner Blue Butterfly. It’s also the home of the Ice Age Trail.
“What makes this area special – the Central Sands, the land of Aldo Leopold and John Muir – is that this is family farm country,” Clarke said. “But make no mistake – the Richfield CAFO is not a family farm.”